Deceptively-Altered Visual Feedback Alters 4km Cycling Time Trial Performance in Trained Cyclists
The brain maintains a performance reserve capacity by regulating fuel utilization. One method of overriding the governor is the utilization of deception. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of deceptively-modified feedback on time to completion during a laboratory based 4000m time trial.
12 trained cyclists (8 Male, 4 Female) age 41.6 ±12.3 years with a mean peak aerobic capacity of 51.3±6.5ml/kg/min. Participants completed a VO2 peak test followed by two baseline 4km time trials without the influence of a virtual avatar competitor. The participants completed two more time trials in randomized order competing against an avatar representing 100% (control) or 102%(deception) of their fastest baseline trial. Participants were told that they were competing against their previous fastest baseline trial during time trials 3 and 4.
Time to completion during the deception condition was shorter than the control condition -3.62±0.8sec p=.004 95% CI [-5.99, -1.24]. Average power output was greater during the deception trial compared to the control trial 7.1±2.28w p=.033 95% CI [0.55, 13.66]. Power output was greater during the deception trial at 30% and 40% of the trial compared to the control trial 12.0±2.4w p=.001 95% CI [5.36, 18.6] and 12.4±2.5w p=.001 95% CI [5.5, 19.4]. Rating of Perceived Exertion was lower during the first 25% of the deception trial compared to the control -1±.348 p=.046 95% CI [-1.98, -.018].
Discussion and Conclusions
It is possible a lower RPE during the first 25% of the time trial allowed for increased power output during the middle portion of the deception trial. The increased power output could have led to the improved time to completion in the deception trial.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Science and Cycling
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Journal of Science and Cycling agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 license, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that you indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to Cycling Research Center
Authors reatin copyright of their work. The Effect of Open Access